PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHN.DE achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -7.60% return.


MCHN.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.75%
6M
-6.17%
YTD
-0.80%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*

XCS6.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.25%
6M
-12.81%
YTD
-7.60%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
-4.29%
10Y*
3.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MCHN.DE
Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc
-0.80%13.01%25.16%-15.29%-18.40%-10.70%
XCS6.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
-7.60%16.41%27.02%-15.14%-15.45%-22.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021

0.96

The correlation between MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHN.DE
MCHN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS6.DE
XCS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCHN.DEXCS6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.04

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

0.08

+1.95

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHN.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum XCS6.DE drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHN.DEXCS6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-56.31%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-21.55%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-24.75%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.29%

-46.98%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.68%

-33.85%

+17.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.92%

-21.29%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

10.42%

-4.91%

Volatility

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) is 5.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that MCHN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHN.DEXCS6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.57%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

13.44%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

18.92%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

27.63%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

25.28%

-0.64%

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS6.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCHN.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCHN.DE nor XCS6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MCHN.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MCHN.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.

MCHN.DE tracks MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCHN.DE and 0.65% for XCS6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHN.DE and XCS6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer