PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHN.DE achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.


MCHN.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*

FLXC.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-5.94%
6M
-8.20%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
7.94%
5Y*
-3.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MCHN.DE
Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc
-0.35%13.01%25.16%-15.29%-18.40%-11.12%
FLXC.DE
Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF
-5.94%17.34%27.28%-15.77%-15.90%-19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.96

The correlation between MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHN.DE
MCHN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXC.DE
FLXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FLXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHN.DEFLXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.31

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

0.64

+1.98

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the FLXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHN.DEFLXC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.27

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

-0.15

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.09

-0.20

Drawdowns

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHN.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHN.DEFLXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-55.61%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-15.19%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-24.70%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-49.07%

+3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.30%

-30.89%

+14.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.07%

-27.95%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

7.38%

-2.57%

Volatility

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHN.DEFLXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

6.78%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

12.35%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

17.78%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

26.71%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

26.20%

-1.43%

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCHN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCHN.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MCHN.DE.

MCHN.DE tracks MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCHN.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHN.DE and FLXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer