MCDS vs. JPIE
MCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF) and JPIE (JPMorgan Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCDS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JPIE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MCDS returned 22.27% vs 5.83% for JPIE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCDS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JPIE.
Performance
MCDS vs. JPIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCDS achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than JPIE's 1.51% return.
MCDS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPIE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCDS vs. JPIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF | 13.38% | 6.51% | 9.83% |
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 1.51% | 7.39% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCDS and JPIE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCDS vs. JPIE — Risk / Return Rank
MCDS
JPIE
MCDS vs. JPIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCDS | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.83 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 5.10 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 25.31 | -14.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCDS | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 3.69 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.99 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MCDS vs. JPIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCDS drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than JPIE's maximum drawdown of -9.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDS and JPIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCDS | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.50% | -9.96% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -1.15% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -2.09% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.23% | +1.78% |
Volatility
MCDS vs. JPIE - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) at 0.61%. This indicates that MCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCDS | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 0.61% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 1.28% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 1.59% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 3.52% | +13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 3.52% | +13.42% |
MCDS vs. JPIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCDS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCDS vs. JPIE - Dividend Comparison
MCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than JPIE's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 5.62% | 5.65% | 6.11% | 5.70% | 4.49% | 0.63% |
MCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF | 1.06% | 1.23% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCDS and JPIE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCDS has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to JPIE (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCDS dropped -22.50% vs JPIE's -9.96%.
On 1-year performance, MCDS leads with 22.27% vs 5.83% for JPIE. On fees, MCDS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MCDS has performed better with a 22.27% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCDS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JPIE.
JPIE has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 1.06% for MCDS.
MCDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JPIE is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCDS and 0.40% for JPIE.
JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCDS and JPIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer