PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCDS vs. JPIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCDS vs. JPIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDS achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than JPIE's 1.77% return.


MCDS

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.05%
6M
13.29%
YTD
15.90%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.65%

JPIE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.34%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$68.11M$65.58M$67.81M
$117.48K$57.47K$28.02K

MCDS vs. JPIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
15.90%6.51%9.83%
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
1.77%7.39%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MCDS and JPIE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCDS vs. JPIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCDS
MCDS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIE
JPIE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JPIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCDS vs. JPIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCDSJPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.65

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

4.31

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

20.57

-10.15

MCDS vs. JPIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the JPIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCDS and JPIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCDS vs. JPIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDS drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than JPIE's maximum drawdown of -9.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDS and JPIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCDSJPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-9.96%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-1.15%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.20%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-2.03%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.24%

+1.71%

Volatility

MCDS vs. JPIE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) at 0.47%. This indicates that MCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCDSJPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

0.47%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

1.40%

+8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

1.64%

+11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

3.48%

+13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

3.48%

+13.10%

MCDS vs. JPIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCDS vs. JPIE - Dividend Comparison

MCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than JPIE's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
5.15%5.65%6.11%5.70%4.49%0.63%
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
1.04%1.23%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCDS and JPIE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCDS has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to JPIE (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCDS dropped -22.50% vs JPIE's -9.96%.

On 1-year performance, MCDS leads with 21.68% vs 4.65% for JPIE. On fees, MCDS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JPIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MCDS has performed better with a 21.68% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MCDS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JPIE.

JPIE has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.04% for MCDS.

MCDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JPIE is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCDS and 0.40% for JPIE.

JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCDS and JPIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer