MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO
MCAD.TO (Evolve Premium Cash Management ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both funds - MCAD.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Evolve, while CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MCAD.TO returned 2.47% vs 2.34% for CBIL.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCAD.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBIL.TO.
Performance
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCAD.TO achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 0.85% return.
MCAD.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MCAD.TO Evolve Premium Cash Management ETF | 0.94% | 2.85% | 4.88% | 2.30% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCAD.TO and CBIL.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MCAD.TO
CBIL.TO
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Premium Cash Management ETF (MCAD.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCAD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.85 | 5.38 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.55 | 58.74 | -43.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 86.93 | 339.60 | -252.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCAD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11 | 9.47 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.78 | 11.64 | -5.85 |
Drawdowns
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.43%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCAD.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCAD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.43% | -0.06% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.16% | -0.04% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.00% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.01% | +0.02% |
Volatility
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve Premium Cash Management ETF (MCAD.TO) is 0.04%, while Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) has a volatility of 0.08%. This indicates that MCAD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCAD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 0.08% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 0.19% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | 0.25% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.75% | 0.31% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.75% | 0.31% | +0.44% |
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCAD.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MCAD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
MCAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than CBIL.TO's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.29% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% |
MCAD.TO Evolve Premium Cash Management ETF | 2.45% | 2.83% | 4.78% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCAD.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MCAD.TO and CBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer