MBLY vs. XBI
MBLY (Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock) is a stock, while XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. Over the past 3 years, MBLY returned -40.80%/yr vs 21.10%/yr for XBI. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MBLY vs. XBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBLY achieves a -23.95% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 20.69% return.
MBLY
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -17.03%
- 6M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- -23.95%
- 1Y
- -43.00%
- 3Y*
- -40.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -27.57%
XBI
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 17.96%
- YTD
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 71.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $80.94M | $73.34M | $64.39M | |
| $1.17B | $1.34B | $1.30B |
MBLY vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock | -23.95% | -47.59% | -54.02% | 23.56% | 31.26% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 20.69% | 35.89% | 1.01% | 7.60% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBLY and XBI is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBLY vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank
MBLY
XBI
MBLY vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBLY | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.42 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 6.92 | -7.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 19.52 | -20.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBLY vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBLY drawdown since its inception was -86.05%, which is greater than XBI's maximum drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBLY and XBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBLY | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.05% | -63.89% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -10.51% | -47.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.08% | -32.99% | -52.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.11% | -14.95% | -68.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.50% | -20.87% | -27.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.46% | 3.72% | +30.74% |
Volatility
MBLY vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison
Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a higher volatility of 23.84% compared to SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) at 8.27%. This indicates that MBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBLY | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.84% | 8.27% | +15.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.83% | 21.50% | +24.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.56% | 26.97% | +29.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.59% | 32.32% | +29.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.59% | 31.93% | +29.66% |
Dividends
MBLY vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison
MBLY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBLY and XBI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBLY has higher volatility (23.84%) compared to XBI (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBLY dropped -86.05% vs XBI's -63.89%.
XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBLY and XBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer