PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCSX vs. POGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBCSX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than POGRX's 26.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MBCSX having a 17.17% annualized return and POGRX not far ahead at 17.39%.


MBCSX

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.94%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.26%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
17.17%

POGRX

1D
-0.02%
1M
15.42%
YTD
26.45%
6M
27.81%
1Y
64.17%
3Y*
29.06%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
2.96%16.68%35.05%51.00%-34.11%17.05%33.53%38.41%0.22%34.43%
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
26.45%32.99%13.09%23.85%-14.61%18.81%17.05%23.98%-4.56%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MBCSX and POGRX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.88

The correlation between MBCSX and POGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCSX vs. POGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCSX
MBCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MBCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MBCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

POGRX
POGRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
POGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
POGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBCSXPOGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

3.69

-2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

4.84

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.65

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.60

-3.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

19.58

-16.23

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the POGRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBCSX and POGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCSXPOGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

3.69

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.82

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.66

-0.22

Drawdowns

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCSX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, which is greater than POGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCSX and POGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCSXPOGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-51.63%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-14.40%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-22.13%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-26.85%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-35.29%

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.02%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-7.13%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

3.37%

+2.00%

Volatility

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) is 3.74%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that MBCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCSXPOGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

7.05%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

14.59%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

17.96%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.81%

19.60%

+10.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

20.47%

+5.12%

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than POGRX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCSX vs. POGRX - Dividend Comparison

MBCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.05%, more than POGRX's 19.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
42.05%43.29%13.12%23.06%18.44%21.93%4.59%11.06%6.70%4.00%4.77%18.85%
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
19.68%24.89%20.79%13.28%12.36%13.68%12.50%5.13%2.45%1.54%5.83%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBCSX and POGRX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POGRX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to MBCSX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBCSX dropped -54.66% vs POGRX's -51.63%.

POGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCSX and POGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer