PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCSX vs. ANFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBCSX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than ANFFX's 22.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MBCSX having a 17.17% annualized return and ANFFX not far behind at 16.32%.


MBCSX

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.94%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.26%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
17.17%

ANFFX

1D
0.02%
1M
10.68%
YTD
22.86%
6M
25.32%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
30.64%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
2.96%16.68%35.05%51.00%-34.11%17.05%33.53%38.41%0.22%34.43%
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
22.86%30.96%23.52%29.10%-29.69%11.98%33.43%26.38%-4.41%34.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MBCSX and ANFFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.92

The correlation between MBCSX and ANFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCSX vs. ANFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCSX
MBCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MBCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MBCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ANFFX
ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBCSXANFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.55

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.19

-3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

18.73

-15.39

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ANFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBCSX and ANFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCSXANFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

3.26

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.74

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.86

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.53

-0.09

Drawdowns

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCSX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ANFFX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCSX and ANFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCSXANFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-55.37%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-13.36%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-20.81%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-37.10%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-37.10%

-11.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-11.37%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

2.98%

+2.39%

Volatility

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) is 3.74%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that MBCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCSXANFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

5.30%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

13.71%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

17.19%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.81%

19.39%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

19.11%

+6.48%

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ANFFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCSX vs. ANFFX - Dividend Comparison

MBCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.05%, more than ANFFX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1
8.06%9.90%9.56%3.89%0.00%7.53%2.45%7.26%9.84%8.19%2.13%6.07%
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
42.05%43.29%13.12%23.06%18.44%21.93%4.59%11.06%6.70%4.00%4.77%18.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBCSX and ANFFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to MBCSX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBCSX dropped -54.66% vs ANFFX's -55.37%.

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCSX and ANFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer