MBCC vs. RSSY

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MBCC is passively managed, while RSSY is actively managed. MBCC charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.

Performance

MBCC vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSSY

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 28.30%
• YTD: 31.04%
• 1Y: 37.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCC vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	-1.22%

Return for Risk

MBCC vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSSY

RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCC vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF (MBCC) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBCC	RSSY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.94	—

Drawdowns

MBCC vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCC and RSSY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCC	RSSY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-29.57%	+29.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.70%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.12%	+7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCC	RSSY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	13.84%	-13.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	18.27%	-18.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	18.27%	-18.27%

MBCC vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCC has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCC vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

MBCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.

Position	TTM	2025
MBCC Monarch Blue Chips Core Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	1.55%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MBCC or RSSY?

On fees, RSSY is cheaper at 1.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCC or RSSY?

RSSY is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCC or RSSY?

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for MBCC.

What is the main difference between MBCC and RSSY?

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCC and 1.04% for RSSY.