MBBA vs. SPMB
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and SPMB (SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. MBBA is actively managed, while SPMB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPMB.
Performance
MBBA vs. SPMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
MBBA vs. SPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.64% |
SPMB SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and SPMB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. SPMB — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
SPMB
MBBA vs. SPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF (SPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBBA | SPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. SPMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum SPMB drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and SPMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | SPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -18.03% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.45% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -2.85% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. SPMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | SPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66% | 4.28% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 6.77% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 7.61% | -2.95% |
MBBA vs. SPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MBBA vs. SPMB - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than SPMB's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMB SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF | 4.08% | 3.98% | 3.76% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.59% | 2.95% | 3.24% | 3.36% | 3.13% | 2.99% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and SPMB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBA.
SPMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.04% for SPMB.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and SPMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer