MBBA vs. IXC
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. MBBA is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
MBBA vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
MBBA vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.72% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and IXC is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
MBBA vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBBA | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -67.88% | +65.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -8.30% | +7.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -17.45% | +16.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 19.32% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 23.44% | -18.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 26.81% | -22.21% |
MBBA vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBA vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than IXC's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.98% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and IXC have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.21% for MBBA.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while IXC is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer