PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBA vs. FTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBA vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBBA

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBA vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBBA and FTSD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBA vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBA

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBA vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBBA vs. FTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBAFTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.04

-0.65

Drawdowns

MBBA vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum FTSD drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and FTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBAFTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-5.32%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.12%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-0.60%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

Volatility

MBBA vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBAFTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

1.31%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

1.85%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

1.79%

+2.87%

MBBA vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MBBA and FTSD have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBA vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
MBBA
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBBA and FTSD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MBBA and FTSD have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.84% for MBBA.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBA and FTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer