MBBA vs. ERX
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). MBBA is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
MBBA vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -18.65%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 41.93%
- 1Y
- 53.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.28%
- 10Y*
- -10.44%
MBBA vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.27% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and ERX is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | -0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERX
MBBA vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBBA | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -99.54% | +96.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -92.94% | +92.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -67.10% | +65.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 41.83% | -37.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 51.93% | -47.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 69.08% | -64.53% |
MBBA vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBA vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, which matches ERX's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.82% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and ERX have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
MBBA and ERX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.83%.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer