PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBA vs. ASEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBA vs. ASEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBBA

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.57%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASEC

1D
0.10%
1M
0.22%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBA vs. ASEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MBBA and ASEC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBA vs. ASEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBBA vs. ASEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MBBA vs. ASEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, which is greater than ASEC's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and ASEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBAASECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-0.46%

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.01%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-0.18%

-0.92%

Volatility

MBBA vs. ASEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBAASECDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

1.48%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.60%

1.48%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

1.48%

+3.12%

MBBA vs. ASEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBBA vs. ASEC - Dividend Comparison

MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than ASEC's 0.45% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MBBA and ASEC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ASEC.

MBBA has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.45% for ASEC.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.29% for ASEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBA and ASEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer