MBBA vs. ASEC
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and ASEC (American Century Securitized Credit ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ASEC.
Performance
MBBA vs. ASEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASEC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBBA vs. ASEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.26% |
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and ASEC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. ASEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. ASEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, which is greater than ASEC's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and ASEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -0.46% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.01% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -0.18% | -0.92% |
Volatility
MBBA vs. ASEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 1.48% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 1.48% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 1.48% | +3.12% |
MBBA vs. ASEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBA vs. ASEC - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than ASEC's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.45% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and ASEC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ASEC.
MBBA has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.45% for ASEC.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.29% for ASEC.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and ASEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer