PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYZ vs. CPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYZ achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than CPSM's 1.94% return.


MAYZ

1D
-1.01%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
6.56%
6M
5.83%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*

CPSM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAYZ and CPSM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024

0.69

The correlation between MAYZ and CPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYZ vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYZ
MAYZ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MAYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSM
CPSM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAYZCPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.67

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

10.57

-8.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

45.23

-35.82

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the CPSM Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYZ and CPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYZ drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, which is greater than CPSM's maximum drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYZ and CPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYZCPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-5.19%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-0.49%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-0.39%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-0.20%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.11%

+1.86%

Volatility

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) at 0.66%. This indicates that MAYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYZCPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

0.66%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

1.16%

+7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

1.65%

+9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.14%

5.05%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.06%

5.05%

+7.01%

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAYZ vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison

MAYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while CPSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CPSM
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAYZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF
2.02%2.15%1.95%2.75%0.69%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYZ and CPSM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAYZ has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to CPSM (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYZ dropped -19.23% vs CPSM's -5.19%.

On 1-year performance, MAYZ leads with 18.50% vs 5.15% for CPSM. On fees, CPSM is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAYZ has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSM is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MAYZ.

MAYZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.00% for CPSM.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MAYZ and 0.69% for CPSM.

CPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYZ and CPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer