MAYU vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MAYU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAYU returned 23.15% vs 21.33% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAYU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

MAYU vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.11% return.

MAYU

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 12.11%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 21.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYU vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	9.68%	11.09%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.11%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and PQAP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.88

The correlation between MAYU and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAYU vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYU

MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 61
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYU vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAYU	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	4.82	-2.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	8.42	-5.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.19	-0.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	15.39	-12.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	86.07	-74.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAYU vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAYU	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	4.82	-2.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.76	-0.46

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYU	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-10.79%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-1.39%	-7.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.11%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-0.60%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	0.25%	+1.78%

Volatility

MAYU vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) at 1.00%. This indicates that MAYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYU	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	1.00%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	3.09%	+5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.10%	4.44%	+6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.92%	11.02%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.92%	11.02%	+1.90%

MAYU vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAYU vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

MAYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
MAYU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYU and PQAP in my portfolio?

MAYU and PQAP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAYU or PQAP?

MAYU has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to PQAP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, MAYU or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, MAYU leads with 23.15% vs 21.33% for PQAP. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PQAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYU or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, MAYU has performed better with a 23.15% return vs 21.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYU or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MAYU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYU or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for MAYU.

What is the main difference between MAYU and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MAYU and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.82 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.