MAYT vs. OCTW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MAYT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 May ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while OCTW is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. MAYT is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAYT returned 15.30%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

MAYT vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 May ETF (MAYT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYT achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 4.72% return.

MAYT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 5.91%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 14.80%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OCTW

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 4.72%
• 6M: 5.16%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: 10.88%
• 5Y*: 8.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYT vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAYT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 May ETF	5.91%	11.29%	18.36%	11.98%
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	4.72%	9.68%	8.67%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYT and OCTW is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023	0.85

The correlation between MAYT and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAYT vs. OCTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAYT	OCTW
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

MAYT vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYT

MAYT Risk / Return Rank: 93
MAYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MAYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MAYT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MAYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MAYT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 82
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYT vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 May ETF (MAYT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAYT	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	2.57	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.61	3.81	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.53	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.63	3.45	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.03	17.79	+16.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAYT vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYT Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYT and OCTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAYT	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	2.57	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.71	1.48	+0.23

Drawdowns

MAYT vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYT drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYT and OCTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYT	OCTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-8.38%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-3.65%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.99%	-8.38%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.05%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-0.82%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.71%	-0.27%

Volatility

MAYT vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 May ETF (MAYT) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 0.72%. This indicates that MAYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYT	OCTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	0.72%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.79%	3.80%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.94%	4.91%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.11%	6.29%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.11%	6.14%	+2.97%

MAYT vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAYT and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

MAYT vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYT nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYT and OCTW in my portfolio?

MAYT and OCTW have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAYT or OCTW?

MAYT has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to OCTW (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYT dropped -11.99% vs OCTW's -8.38%.

Which ETF is better, MAYT or OCTW?

On 3-year performance, MAYT leads with 15.30% vs 10.88% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYT or OCTW?

Over the 3-year period, MAYT has performed better with a 15.30% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYT or OCTW?

MAYT and OCTW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYT or OCTW?

MAYT and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MAYT and OCTW?

MAYT is categorized as Options Trading, while OCTW is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.