PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYM vs. UXJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYM vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYM achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 11.66% return.


MAYM

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJA

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.66%
6M
11.51%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYM vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAYM and UXJA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025

0.84

The correlation between MAYM and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYM vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYM
MAYM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJA
UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYM vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAYMUXJADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.47

2.20

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.78

2.98

+2.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.38

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

3.03

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

36.95

13.05

+23.90

MAYM vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYM Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYM and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAYMUXJADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

2.20

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.36

1.04

+2.31

Drawdowns

MAYM vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYM drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYM and UXJA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYMUXJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-20.01%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-9.83%

+8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.67%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-2.97%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

2.27%

-2.10%

Volatility

MAYM vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) is 0.34%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that MAYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYMUXJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

3.40%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

10.05%

-8.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

13.54%

-11.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.87%

18.59%

-16.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.87%

18.59%

-16.72%

MAYM vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAYM and UXJA have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

MAYM vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYM nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYM and UXJA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UXJA has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to MAYM (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYM dropped -1.22% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 29.61% vs 6.36% for MAYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, MAYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 29.61% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAYM and UXJA have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

MAYM and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MAYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYM and UXJA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer