PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYM vs. CPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYM vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MAYM having a 2.33% return and CPSM slightly lower at 2.27%.


MAYM

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.71%
YTD
2.27%
6M
2.72%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYM vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAYM and CPSM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025

0.55

The correlation between MAYM and CPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYM vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYM
MAYM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSM
CPSM Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYM vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAYMCPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.84

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

13.01

-7.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.95

61.11

-24.16

MAYM vs. CPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYM Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the CPSM Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYM and CPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAYMCPSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

3.78

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.36

1.54

+1.82

Drawdowns

MAYM vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYM drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, smaller than the maximum CPSM drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYM and CPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYMCPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-5.19%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-0.45%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.06%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.20%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

0.10%

+0.07%

Volatility

MAYM vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) have volatilities of 0.34% and 0.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYMCPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.35%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

1.14%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.57%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.87%

5.10%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.87%

5.10%

-3.23%

MAYM vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAYM vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYM nor CPSM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYM and CPSM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPSM has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to MAYM (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYM dropped -1.22% vs CPSM's -5.19%.

On 1-year performance, MAYM leads with 6.36% vs 5.88% for CPSM. On fees, CPSM is cheaper at 0.69% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAYM has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSM is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MAYM.

MAYM and CPSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MAYM and 0.69% for CPSM.

CPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYM and CPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer