MAXJ vs. XTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR).

MAXJ and XTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAXJ is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024. XTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

MAXJ vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAXJ vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	0.14%	8.97%	4.55%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	-4.49%	13.66%	6.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than XTR's -4.49% return.

MAXJ

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 10.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XTR

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAXJ vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.

MAXJ

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

XTR

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXJ

MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXJ vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAXJ	XTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.05	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.53	+1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.21	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.65	+1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.87	6.30	+7.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAXJ vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and XTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAXJ	XTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.05	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.52	+0.91

Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and XTR is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MAXJ vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than XTR's 18.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	1.01%	1.01%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	18.66%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum XTR drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and XTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAXJ	XTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.35%	-20.83%	+14.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.88%	-8.51%	+4.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-6.17%	+5.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-6.13%	+5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	2.23%	-1.47%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 1.32%, while Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAXJ	XTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	4.24%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	8.29%	-6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	13.17%	-7.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.50%	13.87%	-8.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.50%	13.87%	-8.37%