PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXJ vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


MAXJ

1D
0.22%
1M
0.34%
6M
3.11%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.32%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.74M$2.01M$1.56M
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
3.65%8.97%4.56%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-74.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAXJSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.23

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

2.35

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.21

5.19

+18.02

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXJSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-91.35%

+85.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-47.94%

+46.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-77.87%

+77.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-69.07%

+68.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

21.67%

-21.37%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 0.68%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAXJSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

18.09%

-17.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

67.10%

-65.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

88.65%

-86.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

96.10%

-91.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

96.10%

-91.00%

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAXJ vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.97%1.01%0.81%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAXJ and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to MAXJ (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXJ dropped -6.35% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 7.01% for MAXJ. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.97% for MAXJ.

MAXJ is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MAXJ and 0.95% for SBIT.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAXJ and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer