PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXJ vs. HYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAXJ vs. HYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than HYS's 1.08% return.


MAXJ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.38%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYS

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.71%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAXJ vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and HYS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.54

The correlation between MAXJ and HYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXJ vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAXJHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.37

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

3.58

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.01

14.59

+17.42

MAXJ vs. HYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the HYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and HYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAXJHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

1.94

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.81

+0.82

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum HYS drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and HYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXJHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-20.91%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-1.88%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.39%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-1.53%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.46%

-0.16%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 0.29%, while PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAXJHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

1.18%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

2.73%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

3.48%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.27%

6.26%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

6.84%

-1.57%

MAXJ vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAXJ vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than HYS's 7.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.38%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.98%1.01%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAXJ and HYS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYS has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to MAXJ (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXJ dropped -6.35% vs HYS's -20.91%.

On 1-year performance, MAXJ leads with 9.57% vs 6.72% for HYS. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAXJ has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 6.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 0.98% for MAXJ.

MAXJ is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HYS is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MAXJ and 0.56% for HYS.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAXJ and HYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer