PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAVF vs. TVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAVF vs. TVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) and T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAVF achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than TVAL's 16.38% return.


MAVF

1D
1.31%
1M
3.75%
YTD
12.63%
6M
12.50%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TVAL

1D
0.84%
1M
3.54%
YTD
16.38%
6M
17.79%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAVF vs. TVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MAVF
Matrix Advisors Value ETF
12.63%19.46%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
16.38%10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MAVF and TVAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

0.86

The correlation between MAVF and TVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAVF vs. TVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAVF
TVAL

Financial Services

26.7%
18.9%

Technology

23.9%
16.7%

Communication Services

15.5%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.1%

Industrials

8.4%
12.2%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Energy

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Financial Services

MAVF
26.7%
TVAL
18.9%

Technology

MAVF
23.9%
TVAL
16.7%

Communication Services

MAVF
15.5%
TVAL
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MAVF
10.9%
TVAL
7.1%

Industrials

MAVF
8.4%
TVAL
12.2%

Healthcare

MAVF
7.9%
TVAL
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

MAVF
6.7%
TVAL
6.1%

Basic Materials

MAVF

-

TVAL
3.6%

Energy

MAVF

-

TVAL
8.5%

Real Estate

MAVF

-

TVAL
3.0%

Utilities

MAVF

-

TVAL
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAVF vs. TVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAVF
MAVF Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAVF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAVF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TVAL
TVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAVF vs. TVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) and T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAVFTVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

4.22

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

17.72

-4.34

MAVF vs. TVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAVF Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the TVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAVF and TVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAVFTVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.83

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Drawdowns

MAVF vs. TVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAVF drawdown since its inception was -16.44%, which is greater than TVAL's maximum drawdown of -14.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAVF and TVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAVFTVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.44%

-14.84%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-7.15%

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-2.06%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.70%

+0.98%

Volatility

MAVF vs. TVAL - Volatility Comparison

Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to T. Rowe Price Value ETF (TVAL) at 3.10%. This indicates that MAVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAVFTVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.10%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

8.25%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

10.67%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

12.59%

+6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

12.59%

+6.57%

MAVF vs. TVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TVAL's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAVF vs. TVAL - Dividend Comparison

MAVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TVAL's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAVF
Matrix Advisors Value ETF
0.38%0.42%0.00%0.00%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
0.99%1.15%1.16%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAVF and TVAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAVF has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TVAL (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAVF dropped -16.44% vs TVAL's -14.84%.

On 1-year performance, MAVF leads with 35.78% vs 30.05% for TVAL. On fees, TVAL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, TVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAVF has performed better with a 35.78% return vs 30.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TVAL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MAVF.

TVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.38% for MAVF.

They also come from different issuers: Matrix Asset Advisors and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MAVF and 0.33% for TVAL.

TVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAVF and TVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer