PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAV4.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc (MAV4.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MAV4.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAV4.L achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -12.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MAV4.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 2.80%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.72% annualized return.


MAV4.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.20%
1Y
-1.14%
3Y*
-0.75%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.80%

MSFT

1D
-2.05%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-12.59%
6M
-13.43%
1Y
-8.63%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
25.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAV4.L
Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc
0.10%-2.52%2.23%0.72%-3.07%18.01%0.31%3.96%5.76%3.17%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-12.59%7.35%14.90%50.28%-19.47%53.92%38.35%51.56%27.96%28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MAV4.L and MSFT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAV4.L:

£76.39M

MSFT:

$3.10T

EPS

MAV4.L:

£0.02

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

MAV4.L:

27.87

MSFT:

24.82

PEG Ratio

MAV4.L:

0.77

MSFT:

1.74

PS Ratio

MAV4.L:

18.85

MSFT:

9.76

PB Ratio

MAV4.L:

0.90

MSFT:

7.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAV4.L:

£4.03M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAV4.L:

£2.03M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAV4.L:

£4.27M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAV4.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAV4.L
MAV4.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MAV4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAV4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAV4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MAV4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAV4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc (MAV4.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAV4.LMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.96

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.25

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.51

-0.48

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAV4.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is comparable to the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAV4.L and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAV4.LMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

-0.34

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.50

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.95

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.70

-0.49

Drawdowns

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAV4.L drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAV4.L and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAV4.LMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-40.05%

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.84%

-34.18%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.26%

-34.18%

+28.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.29%

-34.18%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.27%

-34.18%

+24.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-23.41%

+18.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-8.81%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

17.11%

-15.95%

Volatility

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc (MAV4.L) is 0.00%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that MAV4.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAV4.LMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

10.36%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

22.00%

-19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

25.43%

-22.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

25.88%

-21.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.31%

27.29%

-19.98%

Dividends

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MAV4.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than MSFT's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAV4.L
Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc
8.70%10.88%6.52%5.83%7.94%5.71%4.76%3.03%20.92%20.53%5.93%5.96%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.85%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

MAV4.L vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maven Income and Growth VCT 4 plc and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202120222023202420252026
-1.52M
82.89B
(MAV4.L) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MAV4.L values in GBp, MSFT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MAV4.L and MSFT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAV4.L and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer