MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

MAUCA.AX (Magnetic Resources NL) and 2099.HK (China Gold International Resources) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — MAUCA.AX in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, 2099.HK in Other Precious Metals & Mining. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Magnetic Resources NL (MAUCA.AX) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MAUCA.AX is traded in AUD, while 2099.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2099.HK values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MAUCA.AX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

2099.HK

• 1D: 10.49%
• 1M: 7.46%
• 6M: -20.98%
• YTD: -2.93%
• 1Y: 115.45%
• 3Y*: 70.83%
• 5Y*: 57.11%
• 10Y*: 30.38%
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAUCA.AX Magnetic Resources NL	73.00%	0.00%	40.85%	42.00%	-56.52%	27.78%	200.00%	1,100.00%	-54.55%	5,400.00%
2099.HK China Gold International Resources	-2.93%	258.30%	36.00%	55.98%	23.13%	106.31%	42.68%	-23.29%	-25.31%	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MAUCA.AX and 2099.HK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010	0.03

Return for Risk

MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAUCA.AX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

2099.HK

2099.HK Risk / Return Rank: 87
2099.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
2099.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
2099.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
2099.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
2099.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magnetic Resources NL (MAUCA.AX) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAUCA.AX	2099.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.30	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MAUCA.AX	2099.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-89.81%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-82.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-32.79%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-44.61%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAUCA.AX	2099.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	47.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	63.18%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	55.55%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	54.53%	—

Dividends

MAUCA.AX vs. 2099.HK - Dividend Comparison

MAUCA.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2099.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
2099.HK China Gold International Resources	2.34%	0.40%	0.00%	8.71%	8.56%	4.44%
MAUCA.AX Magnetic Resources NL	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAUCA.AX and 2099.HK in my portfolio?

MAUCA.AX and 2099.HK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.