PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASKX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASKX achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MASKX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


MASKX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.97%
YTD
18.62%
6M
17.33%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
11.12%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
18.62%12.76%11.35%16.99%-20.39%14.54%19.99%25.54%-11.03%14.61%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MASKX and ASFYX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.17

The correlation between MASKX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASKX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASKX
MASKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MASKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MASKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MASKXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.95

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

17.88

-3.85

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASKX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MASKXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.20

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.22

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.23

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.35

+0.02

Drawdowns

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASKX drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASKX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASKXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.06%

-36.43%

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-5.24%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.53%

-30.32%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-36.43%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.68%

-36.43%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-18.22%

+18.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-13.18%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.45%

+1.64%

Volatility

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 3.67%. This indicates that MASKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASKXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

3.67%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

9.54%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

11.77%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.16%

13.77%

+9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.70%

12.71%

+10.99%

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASKX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASKX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

MASKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
2.64%3.13%4.81%2.92%1.70%7.64%1.42%3.43%4.26%3.15%4.60%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASKX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASKX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASKX dropped -59.06% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

MASKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASKX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer