MARW vs. XDOC
MARW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF) and XDOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. MARW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDOC.
Performance
MARW vs. XDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARW
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 12.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARW vs. XDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF | 4.23% |
XDOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October | 0.00% |
MARW vs. XDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MARW
XDOC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MARW
XDOC
Financial Services
MARW
XDOC
Communication Services
MARW
XDOC
Consumer Cyclical
MARW
XDOC
Healthcare
MARW
XDOC
Industrials
MARW
XDOC
Consumer Defensive
MARW
XDOC
Energy
MARW
XDOC
Utilities
MARW
XDOC
Real Estate
MARW
XDOC
Basic Materials
MARW
XDOC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARW vs. XDOC — Risk / Return Rank
MARW
XDOC
MARW vs. XDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARW | XDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARW | XDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MARW vs. XDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARW drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, which is greater than XDOC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARW and XDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARW | XDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | 0.00% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility
MARW vs. XDOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARW | XDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 0.00% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 0.00% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 0.00% | +6.10% |
MARW vs. XDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than XDOC's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARW vs. XDOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARW nor XDOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MARW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MARW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.
MARW and XDOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARW and 0.79% for XDOC.
Find the right allocation for MARW and XDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer