MARW vs. MSTQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MARW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF) and MSTQ (LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MARW returned 11.31%/yr vs 24.11%/yr for MSTQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARW charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for MSTQ.

Performance

MARW vs. MSTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARW achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than MSTQ's 17.40% return.

MARW

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 12.91%
• 3Y*: 11.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTQ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 9.02%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 31.81%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARW vs. MSTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF	5.01%	10.61%	11.11%	11.83%
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	17.40%	20.57%	19.58%	32.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MARW and MSTQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	0.78

The correlation between MARW and MSTQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MARW vs. MSTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MARW	MSTQ
Technology	36.2%	54.0%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	15.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.2%
Industrials	8.1%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.6%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.1%

Return for Risk

MARW vs. MSTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARW

MARW Risk / Return Rank: 89
MARW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MARW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MARW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MARW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MARW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MSTQ

MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARW vs. MSTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARW	MSTQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	2.23	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.50	2.97	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.39	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	2.58	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.52	8.04	+14.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARW vs. MSTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARW Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the MSTQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARW and MSTQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARW	MSTQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	2.23	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.97	0.87	+1.09

Drawdowns

MARW vs. MSTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARW drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum MSTQ drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARW and MSTQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARW	MSTQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-31.05%	+23.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-12.39%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.58%	-15.22%	+7.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.21%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-8.62%	+8.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	3.97%	-3.40%

Volatility

MARW vs. MSTQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) is 0.71%, while LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that MARW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARW	MSTQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	4.25%	-3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.37%	10.58%	-7.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.23%	14.35%	-10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.10%	18.85%	-12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.10%	18.85%	-12.75%

MARW vs. MSTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTQ's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARW vs. MSTQ - Dividend Comparison

MARW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	11.90%	13.97%	3.72%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARW and MSTQ in my portfolio?

MARW and MSTQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARW or MSTQ?

MSTQ has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to MARW (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARW dropped -7.58% vs MSTQ's -31.05%.

Which ETF is better, MARW or MSTQ?

On 3-year performance, MSTQ leads with 24.11% vs 11.31% for MARW. On fees, MARW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, MARW has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARW or MSTQ?

Over the 3-year period, MSTQ has performed better with a 24.11% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARW or MSTQ?

MARW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARW or MSTQ?

MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.90%, compared with 0.00% for MARW.

What is the main difference between MARW and MSTQ?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARW and 1.59% for MSTQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MARW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.