MARW vs. HELO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MARW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MARW returned 12.94% vs 10.94% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MARW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

MARW vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARW achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.26% return.

MARW

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 12.94%
• 3Y*: 11.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.72%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARW vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF	5.11%	10.61%	11.11%	5.32%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.26%	7.82%	18.05%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MARW and HELO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.84

The correlation between MARW and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

MARW vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MARW	HELO
Technology	36.2%	39.8%
Financial Services	11.9%	10.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.2%
Industrials	8.1%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.5%
Energy	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

MARW vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARW

MARW Risk / Return Rank: 90
MARW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MARW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MARW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MARW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MARW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 51
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARW vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARW	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	1.77	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	2.50	+2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.36	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	1.91	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.59	8.44	+14.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARW vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARW Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARW and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARW	HELO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	1.77	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.97	1.63	+0.34

Drawdowns

MARW vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARW drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARW and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARW	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-10.89%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-5.76%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.32%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-1.18%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	1.30%	-0.73%

Volatility

MARW vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARW	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.70%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.37%	4.99%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.23%	6.20%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.09%	7.95%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.09%	7.95%	-1.86%

MARW vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARW vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

MARW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARW and HELO in my portfolio?

MARW and HELO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARW or HELO?

HELO has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to MARW (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARW dropped -7.58% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, MARW or HELO?

On 1-year performance, MARW leads with 12.94% vs 10.94% for HELO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARW or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, MARW has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARW or HELO?

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MARW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARW or HELO?

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for MARW.

What is the main difference between MARW and HELO?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARW and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MARW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.