MARW vs. DRLL
MARW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. MARW is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MARW returned 10.87%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for DRLL. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MARW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
MARW vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARW achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 34.95% return.
MARW
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.52%
DRLL
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 22.18%
- YTD
- 34.95%
- 1Y
- 42.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $486.14K | $506.54K | $559.53K | |
| $38.44K | $36.97K | $82.02K |
MARW vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF | 6.02% | 10.61% | 11.11% | 11.51% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 34.95% | 7.74% | 0.02% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARW and DRLL is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between MARW and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARW vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
MARW
DRLL
MARW vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARW | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.31 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.54 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.17 | 6.46 | +12.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARW vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARW drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARW and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARW | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -23.73% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -16.99% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.58% | -23.73% | +16.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.52% | +5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -8.14% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 6.67% | -6.08% |
Volatility
MARW vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) is 1.22%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that MARW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARW | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 6.98% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.71% | 18.78% | -15.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 22.98% | -18.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 23.79% | -17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 23.79% | -17.76% |
MARW vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARW vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
MARW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.25% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% |
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARW and DRLL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRLL has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to MARW (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARW dropped -7.58% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 12.43% vs 10.87% for MARW. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, MARW has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MARW.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for MARW.
MARW is categorized as Options Trading, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARW and 0.41% for DRLL.
MARW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARW and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer