PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAMG.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAMG.L
BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
-0.74%8.95%11.42%9.97%-14.53%12.19%4.77%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.94%12.41%21.19%18.05%-8.38%23.34%5.60%
Different Trading Currencies

MAMG.L is traded in GBP, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAMG.L having a -0.74% return and IWDA.L slightly higher at -0.71%.


MAMG.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
1.67%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*

IWDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
2.43%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
12.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMG.L
MAMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MAMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAMG.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAMG.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.66

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.54

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.02

13.27

-2.25

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMG.L and IWDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAMG.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.82

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between MAMG.L and IWDA.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAMG.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.55%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMG.L and IWDA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMG.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-34.11%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-8.67%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-25.88%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-5.59%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-4.48%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.93%

-0.83%

Volatility

MAMG.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAMG.L) is 3.00%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that MAMG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAMG.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

5.27%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.86%

9.03%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.17%

14.95%

-6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.91%

14.47%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

15.49%

-7.51%