PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MALOX vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MALOX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MALOX achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MALOX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.57%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


MALOX

1D
1.82%
1M
0.37%
YTD
6.67%
6M
7.72%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
8.57%

VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
4.18%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MALOX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MALOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
6.67%19.63%9.23%12.63%-15.86%6.69%24.93%17.56%-7.40%13.59%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MALOX and VTV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.81

The correlation between MALOX and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MALOX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MALOX
MALOX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MALOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MALOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MALOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MALOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MALOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MALOX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MALOXVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.25

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

16.04

-6.87

MALOX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MALOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MALOX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MALOX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MALOX drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MALOX and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MALOXVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.83%

-59.27%

+26.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-6.35%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.04%

-14.52%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-17.04%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.76%

-36.78%

+14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-7.86%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.68%

+0.27%

Volatility

MALOX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.34%. This indicates that MALOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MALOXVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.34%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

7.82%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

10.38%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

13.92%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

16.68%

-5.93%

MALOX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MALOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MALOX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

MALOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MALOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.64%9.22%7.68%1.54%6.01%10.32%10.15%5.68%5.50%4.81%2.10%9.86%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MALOX and VTV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MALOX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MALOX dropped -32.83% vs VTV's -59.27%.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MALOX and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer