MAKX vs. XT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - MAKX tracks the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 28.32%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

MAKX vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return.

MAKX

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 17.86%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 42.02%
• 1Y: 82.53%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XT

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 9.47%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 45.88%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAKX vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF	47.39%	21.63%	8.27%	26.03%	-26.41%	3.91%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	20.20%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MAKX and XT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.87

The correlation between MAKX and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MAKX vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAKX	XT
Technology	64.1%	43.5%
Industrials	21.3%	10.1%
Communication Services	10.2%	5.2%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	23.4%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	4.6%

Return for Risk

MAKX vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAKX

MAKX Risk / Return Rank: 81
MAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
MAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 84
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAKX vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAKX	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	2.89	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.83	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.48	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	4.41	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.75	18.51	-2.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAKX vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAKX and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAKX	XT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	2.89	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.66	-0.14

Drawdowns

MAKX vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAKX	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.27%	-34.41%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.05%	-10.45%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.76%	-22.09%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-0.47%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-7.41%	-9.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	2.49%	+2.77%

Volatility

MAKX vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that MAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAKX	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.34%	4.85%	+5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.93%	11.94%	+7.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.03%	15.99%	+13.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.18%	20.76%	+7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.18%	20.08%	+8.10%

MAKX vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAKX vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF	0.10%	0.15%	0.24%	0.52%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	6.61%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAKX and XT in my portfolio?

MAKX and XT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAKX or XT?

MAKX has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, MAKX or XT?

On 3-year performance, MAKX leads with 28.32% vs 18.83% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAKX or XT?

Over the 3-year period, MAKX has performed better with a 28.32% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAKX or XT?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MAKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAKX or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.10% for MAKX.

What is the main difference between MAKX and XT?

MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.