PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGRX vs. PAXDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund (MAGRX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGRX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.


MAGRX

1D
0.21%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
11.11%
6M
10.41%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
9.35%

PAXDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.01%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGRX
BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund
11.11%30.26%-5.65%-1.36%17.20%30.76%3.20%15.34%-17.95%8.20%
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
5.11%18.37%-1.55%9.33%-13.45%14.24%14.25%25.88%-4.25%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGRX and PAXDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between MAGRX and PAXDX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGRX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGRX
MAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXDX
PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund (MAGRX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGRXPAXDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.69

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

5.03

+4.96

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGRX and PAXDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGRX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, which is greater than PAXDX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGRX and PAXDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGRXPAXDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.68%

-33.58%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-4.49%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-14.56%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-25.04%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-0.74%

-8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.92%

-5.25%

-10.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.47%

+1.64%

Volatility

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund (MAGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MAGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGRXPAXDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

0.00%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

4.06%

+9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

7.94%

+9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

13.16%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

16.48%

+6.05%

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGRX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGRX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

MAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than PAXDX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGRX
BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund
7.60%8.44%3.32%4.16%10.86%3.90%2.07%2.97%20.12%49.72%0.87%8.29%
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
1.06%2.17%2.07%2.43%2.48%58.94%2.88%4.69%3.55%2.13%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGRX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGRX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGRX dropped -65.68% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.

MAGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGRX and PAXDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer