PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MAGG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGG.L achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.


MAGG.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.44%
YTD
12.91%
6M
14.15%
1Y
26.97%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAGG.L
BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
12.91%10.89%19.68%12.90%-17.33%18.23%6.63%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG.L and CSP1.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.77

The correlation between MAGG.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGG.L
CSP1.L

Technology

32.3%
38.0%

Financial Services

15.1%
11.3%

Industrials

10.6%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.9%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.7%

Utilities

3.5%
2.2%

Energy

3.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Technology

MAGG.L
32.3%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Financial Services

MAGG.L
15.1%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Industrials

MAGG.L
10.6%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGG.L
9.2%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Communication Services

MAGG.L
8.9%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Healthcare

MAGG.L
8.5%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

MAGG.L
4.1%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Utilities

MAGG.L
3.5%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Energy

MAGG.L
3.0%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

MAGG.L
2.8%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Real Estate

MAGG.L
2.1%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGG.L
MAGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MAGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.07

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

14.99

+0.83

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.04

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.09

-0.23

Drawdowns

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-25.48%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-7.12%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-20.77%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-20.77%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.24%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-3.32%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.94%

-0.24%

Volatility

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that MAGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.62%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

7.16%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

10.62%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.08%

14.31%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

15.57%

-3.52%

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MAGG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAGG.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MAGG.L.

MAGG.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. MAGG.L tracks Morningstar UK Mod Adv Tgt Alloc NR GBP, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MAGG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer