PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MAG7.L is traded in USD, while 3AAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3AAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAG7.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than 3AAP.L's 29.54% return.


MAG7.L

1D
5.22%
1M
13.25%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-1.40%
1Y
126.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
33.82%
YTD
29.54%
6M
17.70%
1Y
160.00%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
22.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAG7.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities
-0.37%-28.43%150.95%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.54%-22.82%157.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MAG7.L and 3AAP.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.46

The correlation between MAG7.L and 3AAP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAG7.L
MAG7.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAG7.L3AAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.55

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

7.08

-2.75

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAG7.L and 3AAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAG7.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.42

-0.18

Drawdowns

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAG7.L drawdown since its inception was -91.14%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAG7.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAG7.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.14%

-78.42%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.56%

-44.81%

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.38%

-2.86%

-42.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.28%

-35.89%

-11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.97%

22.48%

+6.49%

Volatility

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) has a higher volatility of 27.50% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 15.12%. This indicates that MAG7.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAG7.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.50%

15.12%

+12.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.68%

49.41%

+22.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.62%

99.40%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.75%

88.26%

+36.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.75%

90.10%

+34.65%

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAG7.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

MAG7.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAG7.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MAG7.L and 3AAP.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAG7.L and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

MAG7.L tracks Solactive Magnificent 7 Index, while 3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAG7.L and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer