PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAFOX vs. EFCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, MAFOX has outperformed EFCNX with an annualized return of 17.63%, while EFCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.46% annualized return.


MAFOX

1D
0.00%
1M
8.99%
YTD
15.80%
6M
15.18%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
17.63%

EFCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAFOX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund
15.80%12.76%31.11%52.63%-38.05%17.13%46.85%31.16%3.63%29.90%
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
0.00%28.71%25.88%40.82%-31.09%22.95%49.60%36.32%-9.88%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MAFOX and EFCNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2014

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between MAFOX and EFCNX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAFOX vs. EFCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAFOX
MAFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MAFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EFCNX
EFCNX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EFCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EFCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) and Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAFOXEFCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.65

-1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

12.23

-10.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

70.23

-64.31

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the EFCNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAFOX and EFCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAFOXEFCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

3.86

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Drawdowns

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAFOX drawdown since its inception was -89.93%, which is greater than EFCNX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAFOX and EFCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAFOXEFCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.93%

-38.34%

-51.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-2.90%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.48%

-27.61%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.39%

-38.34%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.39%

-38.34%

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-8.64%

-45.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

0.94%

+4.01%

Volatility

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (MAFOX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MAFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAFOXEFCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

0.00%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

0.00%

+13.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

9.27%

+8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

22.89%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.67%

22.80%

-0.13%

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAFOX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than EFCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAFOX vs. EFCNX - Dividend Comparison

MAFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, more than EFCNX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFCNX
Emerald Insights Fund
8.50%8.50%1.27%0.00%5.41%15.80%9.41%0.04%27.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAFOX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund
13.84%16.03%4.04%3.05%2.01%11.20%0.53%5.45%4.43%4.06%0.00%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAFOX and EFCNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAFOX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to EFCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAFOX dropped -89.93% vs EFCNX's -38.34%.

EFCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAFOX and EFCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer