PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAFIX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAFIX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 0.11% return.


MAFIX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.22%
YTD
13.53%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

GFSYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.96%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
13.53%8.41%8.99%5.02%4.08%14.79%24.89%21.63%-1.46%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
0.11%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MAFIX and GFSYX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.12

The correlation between MAFIX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAFIX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAFIX
MAFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MAFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAFIXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

2.02

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

4.27

+12.43

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAFIX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAFIXGFSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

1.10

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.27

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.89

+0.13

Drawdowns

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAFIX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAFIXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-9.54%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-1.34%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-4.49%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-4.49%

-14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-0.91%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.65%

+1.40%

Volatility

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.92%. This indicates that MAFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAFIXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

0.92%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

1.95%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

2.54%

+9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.32%

3.67%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

3.72%

+9.12%

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAFIX has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAFIX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

MAFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than GFSYX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
7.17%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%
MAFIX
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
10.37%11.78%4.57%3.80%4.12%10.65%10.29%12.30%9.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAFIX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAFIX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to GFSYX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAFIX dropped -19.21% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

MAFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAFIX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer