PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAAS vs. ECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAAS vs. ECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highest Performances Holdings Inc (MAAS) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAAS achieves a 229.44% return, which is significantly higher than ECO's 90.59% return.


MAAS

1D
-2.04%
1M
18.36%
6M
191.64%
YTD
229.44%
1Y
387.40%
3Y*
-63.26%
5Y*
-43.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-34.27%

ECO

1D
0.79%
1M
13.59%
6M
59.28%
YTD
90.59%
1Y
186.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.81M$22.75M$24.38M
$1.18M$2.20M$1.60M

MAAS vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAAS
Highest Performances Holdings Inc
229.44%-73.13%-94.57%142.91%
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
90.59%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MAAS and ECO is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAAS:

$5.71B

ECO:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAAS vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAAS
MAAS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MAAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MAAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAAS vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highest Performances Holdings Inc (MAAS) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAASECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.29

10.57

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.85

29.65

+2.20

MAAS vs. ECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAAS Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is comparable to the ECO Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAAS and ECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAAS vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAAS drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than ECO's maximum drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAS and ECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAASECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-46.15%

-53.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.77%

-17.66%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.96%

0.00%

-97.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.73%

-14.58%

-51.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.89%

6.29%

+5.60%

Volatility

MAAS vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison

Highest Performances Holdings Inc (MAAS) has a higher volatility of 49.38% compared to Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) at 13.44%. This indicates that MAAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAASECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.38%

13.44%

+35.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.59%

31.16%

+57.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.46%

41.51%

+60.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.84%

42.20%

+120.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.42%

42.20%

+98.22%

Dividends

MAAS vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison

MAAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.


PositionTTM20252024
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
8.29%6.26%15.57%
MAAS
Highest Performances Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MAAS vs. ECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Highest Performances Holdings Inc and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAAS and ECO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAAS has higher volatility (49.38%) compared to ECO (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAAS dropped -99.71% vs ECO's -46.15%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAAS and ECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer