PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, M9SD.DE achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.


M9SD.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
3.74%
6M
11.23%
1Y
69.16%
3Y*
40.66%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*
12.24%

PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
M9SD.DE
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
3.74%130.74%20.64%2.95%-2.13%-1.63%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.69

The correlation between M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

M9SD.DE
M9SD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


M9SD.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.81

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

4.60

+1.87

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current M9SD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


M9SD.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.30

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.26

-1.14

Drawdowns

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum M9SD.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


M9SD.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.12%

-16.60%

-63.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.35%

-16.60%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-16.60%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.37%

-15.00%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-4.40%

-38.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.84%

6.55%

+4.29%

Volatility

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.11%. This indicates that M9SD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


M9SD.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

5.11%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.87%

20.18%

+13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

23.12%

+19.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.36%

16.13%

+18.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

16.13%

+18.60%

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

M9SD.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

M9SD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither M9SD.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M9SD.DE.

M9SD.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: China Post Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for M9SD.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for M9SD.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer