LZSIX vs. ICMPX
LZSIX (Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6) and ICMPX (Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZSIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard, while ICMPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 5 years, LZSIX returned 6.64%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for ICMPX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LZSIX charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ICMPX.
Performance
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZSIX achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than ICMPX's 0.59% return.
LZSIX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 26.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.02%
ICMPX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZSIX Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 | 15.99% | 24.70% | 2.11% | 12.08% | -15.56% | 3.27% | 8.33% | 20.85% |
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio | 0.59% | 11.70% | 5.62% | 17.84% | -20.11% | 10.02% | 23.95% | 32.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZSIX and ICMPX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between LZSIX and ICMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZSIX vs. ICMPX — Risk / Return Rank
LZSIX
ICMPX
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 (LZSIX) and Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZSIX | ICMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.15 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.96 | 0.38 | +8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZSIX drawdown since its inception was -55.86%, which is greater than ICMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSIX and ICMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZSIX | ICMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.86% | -34.70% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -15.45% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -15.45% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.92% | -34.70% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.48% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -8.74% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 6.07% | -3.11% |
Volatility
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 (LZSIX) and Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZSIX | ICMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.32% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 11.61% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 14.26% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 16.48% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 17.57% | -1.90% |
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZSIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ICMPX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZSIX vs. ICMPX - Dividend Comparison
LZSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than ICMPX's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio | 4.32% | 4.35% | 2.92% | 0.62% | 1.07% | 2.04% | 0.87% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LZSIX Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 | 2.16% | 2.50% | 1.74% | 1.48% | 2.22% | 3.39% | 0.98% | 2.18% | 3.22% | 0.66% | 1.15% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZSIX and ICMPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICMPX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to LZSIX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSIX dropped -55.86% vs ICMPX's -34.70%.
LZSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZSIX and ICMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer