LZFIX vs. FDGFX
LZFIX (Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LZFIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lazard, while FDGFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, LZFIX returned 4.56%/yr vs 15.41%/yr for FDGFX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LZFIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.
Performance
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZFIX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 16.67% return.
LZFIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.82%
FDGFX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 15.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | 4.44% | 4.09% | -3.09% | 18.84% | -5.29% | 22.88% | 1.15% | 9.25% |
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | 16.67% | 22.48% | 27.58% | 17.86% | -11.61% | 27.96% | 2.20% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZFIX and FDGFX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LZFIX and FDGFX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZFIX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank
LZFIX
FDGFX
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZFIX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.78 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 11.55 | -11.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZFIX drawdown since its inception was -41.91%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZFIX and FDGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZFIX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.91% | -60.77% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.87% | -10.16% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -21.37% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.69% | -21.37% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -1.56% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -7.50% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | 2.45% | +9.20% |
Volatility
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) at 4.07%. This indicates that LZFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZFIX | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 4.07% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 12.26% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 15.06% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 16.79% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 19.27% | +1.85% |
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZFIX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison
LZFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.99%, more than FDGFX's 8.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | 8.34% | 9.35% | 9.81% | 3.48% | 11.46% | 7.81% | 1.89% | 4.84% | 22.93% | 15.35% | 1.58% | 8.44% |
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | 19.99% | 20.87% | 14.95% | 8.68% | 12.81% | 15.59% | 1.12% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZFIX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZFIX has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to FDGFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZFIX dropped -41.91% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.
FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZFIX and FDGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer