PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYYA.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than XAMB.DE's 13.11% return.


LYYA.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.66%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.02%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
12.81%

XAMB.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
4.36%
YTD
13.11%
6M
13.19%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
10.86%7.87%26.02%20.23%-13.67%32.82%5.50%31.13%-9.12%
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
13.11%2.25%15.42%20.65%-17.81%36.43%7.63%32.88%-7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018

0.96

The correlation between LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XAMB.DE
XAMB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYYA.DEXAMB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.49

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

9.16

+5.24

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYYA.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.57

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.67

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.74

-0.21

Drawdowns

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than XAMB.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYYA.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-31.83%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-8.28%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-22.09%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-22.09%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-5.61%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.26%

-0.61%

Volatility

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) is 2.64%, while Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that LYYA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAMB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYYA.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.89%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

9.82%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

13.16%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

14.94%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

16.40%

-1.27%

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYYA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XAMB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYYA.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYYA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while XAMB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAMB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAMB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World, while XAMB.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Filtered PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYYA.DE and 0.18% for XAMB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYYA.DE and XAMB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer