PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LYY4.DE having a 15.21% return and PR1J.DE slightly higher at 15.82%.


LYY4.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.08%
YTD
15.21%
6M
15.56%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
8.60%

PR1J.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
15.21%13.10%12.42%14.70%-10.26%8.20%3.15%12.35%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.82%12.92%13.38%16.35%-11.58%10.23%5.13%13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.98

The correlation between LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYY4.DEPR1J.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.83

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

9.22

+0.45

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYY4.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.54

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.58

-0.33

Drawdowns

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY4.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.07%, which is greater than PR1J.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYY4.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.07%

-28.08%

-25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-10.30%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-16.24%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-18.66%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.01%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-5.53%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.17%

-0.24%

Volatility

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) is 3.04%, while Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that LYY4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYY4.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.43%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

15.05%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

18.93%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.50%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

17.41%

-1.08%

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY4.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYY4.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYY4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than PR1J.DE's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.88%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.51%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.79%1.73%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LYY4.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYY4.DE and PR1J.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer