PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYY4.DE achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LYY4.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 8.60%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


LYY4.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.08%
YTD
15.21%
6M
15.56%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
8.60%

LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.96%
YTD
20.63%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
15.21%13.10%12.42%14.70%-10.26%8.20%3.15%20.97%-11.07%10.82%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2006

0.54

The correlation between LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYY4.DELYMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.77

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

11.23

-1.57

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYY4.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.40

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.94

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.08

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.77

-0.52

Drawdowns

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY4.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.07%, which is greater than LYMS.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYY4.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.07%

-50.00%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-10.02%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-26.74%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-31.12%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.62%

-31.12%

+2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.86%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-8.78%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.37%

-0.44%

Volatility

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) is 3.04%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that LYY4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYY4.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.37%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

10.99%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

15.73%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

19.91%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

19.68%

-3.35%

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY4.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYY4.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYY4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.88%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

LYY4.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LYY4.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYY4.DE and LYMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer