PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYXD.DE is traded in EUR, while IBTU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYXD.DE achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than IBTU.L's 2.55% return.


LYXD.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.11%
1Y
0.74%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
-2.13%
10Y*
-0.11%

IBTU.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.45%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.02%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
1.96%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYXD.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.14%1.71%1.17%8.47%-19.30%-2.81%4.17%5.21%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.55%-8.02%12.18%1.81%7.35%7.46%-7.36%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LYXD.DE and IBTU.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

-0.04

The correlation between LYXD.DE and IBTU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYXD.DE
LYXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LYXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYXD.DEIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.07

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.59

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

1.35

-1.15

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYXD.DE and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYXD.DEIBTU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.36

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.57

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.33

+0.31

Drawdowns

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -13.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYXD.DE and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYXD.DEIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-13.27%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-3.78%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

-11.54%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-11.78%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.65%

-6.76%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-5.82%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.66%

-0.13%

Volatility

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 1.25%. This indicates that LYXD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYXD.DEIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

1.25%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

4.22%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

6.15%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

7.57%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.12%

7.32%

-1.20%

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYXD.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTU.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYXD.DE vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

LYXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%
LYXD.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYXD.DE and IBTU.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for LYXD.DE.

LYXD.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while IBTU.L is Government Bonds. LYXD.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 7-10 Year Bond, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for LYXD.DE and 0.07% for IBTU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYXD.DE and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer