PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYXA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYXA.DE achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SYBG.DE's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LYXA.DE has outperformed SYBG.DE with an annualized return of -1.46%, while SYBG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.83% annualized return.


LYXA.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.91%
YTD
-0.31%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-3.59%
10Y*
-1.46%

SYBG.DE

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.06%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
1.48%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
-5.13%
10Y*
-1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYXA.DE
Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond UCITS ETF Acc
-0.31%-1.00%-0.16%5.59%-18.96%-3.36%3.47%3.82%1.90%-1.08%
SYBG.DE
SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF
1.48%0.15%0.07%5.36%-28.98%2.15%2.00%11.90%0.08%-1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2012

0.55

The correlation between LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYXA.DE
LYXA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
LYXA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYXA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYXA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LYXA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYXA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBG.DE
SYBG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SYBG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYXA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYXA.DESYBG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.11

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

0.88

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

2.73

-3.14

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYXA.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the SYBG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYXA.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, smaller than the maximum SYBG.DE drawdown of -36.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYXA.DESYBG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.01%

-36.66%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-5.42%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-8.78%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-36.25%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.01%

-36.66%

+11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.12%

-26.61%

+6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-13.47%

+6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.75%

-0.31%

Volatility

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYXA.DE) is 1.19%, while SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBG.DE) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that LYXA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYXA.DESYBG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

2.23%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

6.24%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

7.90%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

11.77%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.32%

13.82%

-8.50%

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYXA.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SYBG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYXA.DE vs. SYBG.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYXA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYBG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYXA.DE
Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBG.DE
SPDR Bloomberg UK Gilt UCITS ETF
3.74%3.64%2.65%1.69%1.22%0.82%1.11%1.14%1.27%1.60%1.77%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for LYXA.DE.

LYXA.DE tracks MTS Mid Price Highest Rated Macro-Weighted All-Maturity (EUR), while SYBG.DE tracks Bloomberg UK Gilt. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for LYXA.DE and 0.15% for SYBG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYXA.DE and SYBG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer