PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYRNX vs. FAOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LYRNX

1D
1.60%
1M
0.57%
6M
7.10%
YTD
11.00%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.45%

FAOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
-0.26%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LYRNX
Lyrical International Value Equity Fund
11.00%35.45%-2.53%12.96%-12.90%15.23%20.44%
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
0.00%15.36%5.06%20.52%-24.31%19.42%20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LYRNX and FAOSX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2020

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between LYRNX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYRNX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYRNX
LYRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LYRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LYRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOSX
FAOSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYRNXFAOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

-0.32

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

-0.48

+5.71

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the FAOSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYRNX and FAOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYRNX drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, smaller than the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYRNX and FAOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYRNXFAOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-36.24%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-7.26%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.40%

-13.96%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-36.24%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-5.86%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-7.90%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

4.48%

-0.93%

Volatility

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison

Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that LYRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYRNXFAOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

0.00%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

0.00%

+15.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

7.68%

+10.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.65%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

16.56%

+4.47%

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYRNX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYRNX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison

LYRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOSX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z
8.67%8.67%1.80%1.12%0.85%2.07%0.00%1.70%5.30%3.93%
LYRNX
Lyrical International Value Equity Fund
5.21%5.79%3.25%1.11%2.96%5.46%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYRNX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYRNX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYRNX dropped -33.02% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.

LYRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYRNX and FAOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer