PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQS.DE achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than EMA5.DE's 3.09% return.


LYQS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.68%
6M
3.34%
YTD
4.61%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
1.37%

EMA5.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.09%
6M
1.55%
YTD
3.09%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.61%0.04%6.43%5.45%-11.25%5.76%-0.41%
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
3.09%-2.08%14.60%4.24%-4.92%8.07%-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.66

The correlation between LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQS.DE
LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA5.DE
EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYQS.DEEMA5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.17

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

2.20

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

5.73

+6.17

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQS.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-10.01%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.87%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.78%

-10.01%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-10.01%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-2.45%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-3.33%

-9.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.10%

-0.19%

Volatility

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) is 1.07%, while L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that LYQS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQS.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

2.97%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

5.43%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

6.74%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

7.21%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

7.05%

+9.97%

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYQS.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYQS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than EMA5.DE's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
2.44%6.10%5.86%4.63%3.06%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.12%5.36%3.57%6.06%6.00%4.33%4.48%5.10%5.08%5.40%5.15%6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index, while EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQS.DE and EMA5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer