LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

LYQS.DE (Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and ASRC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - LYQS.DE tracks the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index while ASRC.DE tracks the JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYQS.DE returned 1.74%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ASRC.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LYQS.DE is traded in EUR, while ASRC.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASRC.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQS.DE achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than ASRC.DE's 4.95% return.

LYQS.DE

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 1Y: 11.97%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 1.74%
• 10Y*: 1.50%

ASRC.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 1Y: 12.13%
• 3Y*: 6.85%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LYQS.DE Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	5.26%	0.04%	6.43%	5.45%	-11.25%	5.89%
ASRC.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF	4.95%	0.49%	11.52%	6.43%	-12.67%	6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.69

The correlation between LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQS.DE

LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ASRC.DE

ASRC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 59
ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ASRC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ASRC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ASRC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
ASRC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LYQS.DE	ASRC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.77	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.65	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	4.07	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	11.99	+1.31

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than ASRC.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYQS.DE	ASRC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.51%	-15.63%	-17.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-2.97%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.78%	-12.90%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.18%	-15.63%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-0.79%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-6.16%	-6.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.01%	-0.11%

Volatility

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYQS.DE	ASRC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.51%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.08%	5.17%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	6.83%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.63%	9.25%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	9.11%	+7.91%

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LYQS.DE vs. ASRC.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYQS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while ASRC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASRC.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYQS.DE Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	5.09%	5.36%	3.57%	6.06%	6.00%	4.33%	4.48%	5.10%	5.08%	5.40%	5.15%	6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE in my portfolio?

LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LYQS.DE or ASRC.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYQS.DE or ASRC.DE?

LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between LYQS.DE and ASRC.DE?

LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index, while ASRC.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas.