LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE
LYQL.DE (Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc)) and WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LYQL.DE is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LYQL.DE returned -14.67% vs 26.01% for WEBN.DE. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. LYQL.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBN.DE.
Performance
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYQL.DE achieves a -11.31% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 13.12% return.
LYQL.DE
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -11.31%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 1Y
- -14.67%
- 3Y*
- -25.51%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -24.43%
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LYQL.DE Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) | -11.31% | -35.38% | -8.85% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.12% | 9.70% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYQL.DE and WEBN.DE is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024 | -0.65 |
The correlation between LYQL.DE and WEBN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYQL.DE
WEBN.DE
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYQL.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYQL.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.65 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 2.96 | -4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYQL.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.14%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQL.DE and WEBN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYQL.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.14% | -21.22% | -77.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.22% | -15.77% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.14% | -1.26% | -97.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.00% | -5.99% | -77.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 8.78% | +2.82% |
Volatility
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYQL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) at 3.70%. This indicates that LYQL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYQL.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 3.70% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.96% | 8.93% | +18.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.22% | 24.35% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 21.22% | +13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 21.22% | +15.00% |
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYQL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYQL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYQL.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYQL.DE and WEBN.DE have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYQL.DE.
LYQL.DE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while WEBN.DE is Global Equities. LYQL.DE tracks ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYQL.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYQL.DE and WEBN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer